Deep Research Agent

Paste raw notes and source excerpts, get a cited synthesis brief with a confidence read on every claim.

A synthesis desk for research that already happened somewhere else. Paste in a question plus a stack of labeled source excerpts (articles, transcripts, notes, quotes) and it returns one answer with every finding tagged back to its source, disagreements called out instead of papered over, and the gaps flagged when the sources don't actually cover something. It never searches the web or invents a source; it only reasons over what you hand it. Example input: "Question: Should we build our own vector search or use a hosted provider? Source 1 (internal eng notes): 'Our query volume is under 50k/day, self-hosting pgvector has worked fine so far.' Source 2 (vendor comparison doc): 'Hosted providers add ~$400/mo at our scale but remove the ops burden.'" Example output: "{ answer: 'At current volume, self-hosting remains viable; the tradeoff is ops time against roughly $400/mo.', key_findings: [{ finding: 'Query volume under 50k/day works fine on pgvector today', sources: ['Source 1'] }, { finding: 'Hosted adds about $400/mo but removes ops burden', sources: ['Source 2'] }], confidence: 'medium', gaps: ['no data on projected query volume growth'] }"